City
Epaper

Informers take enormous risk; govt rewards should encourage them to come forward: Bombay HC

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: January 27, 2023 15:37 IST

Informers take enormous risks and the government’s approach should not discourage them from coming forward with information, the Bombay ...

Open in App

Informers take enormous risks and the government’s approach should not discourage them from coming forward with information, the Bombay High Court said recently, directing the Centre to pay reward to the widow of a man who had tipped Customs officials about smuggled diamonds worth nearly Rs 90 lakh in 1991.

A division bench of Justices Nitin Jamdar and Abhay Ahuja in its order of January 5, which was made available later, noted that the objective behind offering a reward to informers is to aid the department in taking measures to safeguard the exchequer.

The bench was hearing a petition filed by one Jayashree Dhavre, widow of Chandrakant Dhavre, seeking reward given to informers as per government policy.

In 1991, the petition had claimed, the Customs department seized smuggled diamonds based on information shared by Chandrakant. The informer was paid an advance of Rs 3 lakh over the next few years but the final amount was never disbursed despite several reminders.

The department told the court that it needed to first verify if Chandrakant was the real informer, but the bench rejected the contention noting that it had earlier released two advance payments to him.

The approach should not be such that it discourages the informers from coming forward. Ultimately, the objective of offering a reward to the informer is to aid the department in taking measures to safeguard the public exchequer, the court said.

The informers take enormous risks in providing information. Unfortunately, in this case, the respondents (Union government) have taken a rigid stand, when the correct approach would have been to go by broad probabilities of the case, the peculiar circumstances of the case and the hardship of the petitioner and should have handled this case with sensitivity, the HC said.

As per the petition filed in 2021, Chandrakant had in March 1991 provided specific inputs to the office of the Marine and Preventive wing of the Mumbai Commissionerate of Customs about smuggled diamonds.

Later, Customs department searched the premises of some jewellers and recovered rough diamonds worth Rs 3.21 lakh and polished diamonds worth Rs 84.47 lakh.

Tags: Bombay High CourtCustom departmentDivision Bench
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraReligion Is One Consideration In Custody Cases, But Child Welfare Is Primary Factor: Bombay High Court

MaharashtraHusband’s Plea for Action Against Wife Over Explicit Viral Video Dismissed by Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court

National‘Question Kunal Kamra In Chennai’: Bombay HC To Police; Grants Protection From Arrest

Navi MumbaiNavi Mumbai: ‘Dog Mafia’ Slur Lands Seawoods Resident in Jail; Bombay HC Orders 7‑Day Term for Contempt

MaharashtraDevendra Fadnavis Summoned by HC in Petition Challenging His 2024 Maharashtra Assembly Poll Win

Maharashtra Realted Stories

MaharashtraMaharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis’s Daughter Secures 92.6% in ICSE 10th Board Exams

MumbaiMumbai: FIR Registered in Vakola Hit-and-Run Case That Killed Pedestrian After 8-Month Delay

MumbaiDeven Bharti Takes Charge as Mumbai Police Commissioner; Post Returns to ADG Rank After 10 Years

LifestyleHappy Maharashtra Day 2025 Wishes: Messages, Quotes, WhatsApp Status and Images to share and Celebrate Maharashtra Din

MumbaiMumbai: Central Railway Launches QR Code-Based Timetable System for Mail/Express Trains