City
Epaper

Informers take enormous risk; govt rewards should encourage them to come forward: Bombay HC

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: January 27, 2023 15:37 IST

Informers take enormous risks and the government’s approach should not discourage them from coming forward with information, the Bombay ...

Open in App

Informers take enormous risks and the government’s approach should not discourage them from coming forward with information, the Bombay High Court said recently, directing the Centre to pay reward to the widow of a man who had tipped Customs officials about smuggled diamonds worth nearly Rs 90 lakh in 1991.

A division bench of Justices Nitin Jamdar and Abhay Ahuja in its order of January 5, which was made available later, noted that the objective behind offering a reward to informers is to aid the department in taking measures to safeguard the exchequer.

The bench was hearing a petition filed by one Jayashree Dhavre, widow of Chandrakant Dhavre, seeking reward given to informers as per government policy.

In 1991, the petition had claimed, the Customs department seized smuggled diamonds based on information shared by Chandrakant. The informer was paid an advance of Rs 3 lakh over the next few years but the final amount was never disbursed despite several reminders.

The department told the court that it needed to first verify if Chandrakant was the real informer, but the bench rejected the contention noting that it had earlier released two advance payments to him.

The approach should not be such that it discourages the informers from coming forward. Ultimately, the objective of offering a reward to the informer is to aid the department in taking measures to safeguard the public exchequer, the court said.

The informers take enormous risks in providing information. Unfortunately, in this case, the respondents (Union government) have taken a rigid stand, when the correct approach would have been to go by broad probabilities of the case, the peculiar circumstances of the case and the hardship of the petitioner and should have handled this case with sensitivity, the HC said.

As per the petition filed in 2021, Chandrakant had in March 1991 provided specific inputs to the office of the Marine and Preventive wing of the Mumbai Commissionerate of Customs about smuggled diamonds.

Later, Customs department searched the premises of some jewellers and recovered rough diamonds worth Rs 3.21 lakh and polished diamonds worth Rs 84.47 lakh.

Tags: Bombay High CourtCustom departmentDivision Bench
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiMumbai Police Registers First FIR in Mahim for Feeding Pigeons Following BMC Complaint

MumbaiMumbai: Five Candidates Booked for Submitting Fake Mark Sheets for Peon Posts at Bombay High Court

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

MumbaiGaneshotsav 2025: Govt Affidavit to Bombay HC Confirms Large Idols Of Sarvajanik Mandal to Be Immersed in Sea

MumbaiMumbai 2006 Train Blast Case: Bombay High Court Acquits All 12 Accused, Rejects State Govt's Plea for Death Sentence

Maharashtra Realted Stories

AurangabadFake Currency Racket Busted in Maharashtra: Counterfeit Notes Worth Rs 60 Lakh Seized from Bungalow in Ahilyanagar; 7 Arrested

MaharashtraWho Is Ashima Mittal? IAS Officer from Jaipur Takes Charge as Jalna District Collector

MaharashtraBeed: Locals Pelt Stones at MSRTC Buses After Autorickshaw Driver Killed in Accident Near Pangari Tanda in Parli

MaharashtraMahadev Munde Murder Case: Manoj Jarange Demands Immediate Arrest, Says ‘Dignity of Woman Was Compromised’

MumbaiIIT Bombay Student Dies by Suicide After Jumping from Hostel Terrace in Mumbai