City
Epaper

Relief for Raj Thackeray as Bombay HC quashes FIR against him for flouting SEC orders in 2010

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: November 10, 2023 12:12 IST

The Bombay High Court has quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray, ...

Open in App

The Bombay High Court has quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray, pertaining to allegations of disobeying an order of a public servant by overstaying in the Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation area ahead of civic elections in 2010. A division bench, comprising Justices Ajey S Gadkari and Sharmila U Deshmukh, pronounced this decision, Live Law reported.

According to reports, the FIR had accused Thackeray of violating a circular issued by the State Election Commission (SEC), requiring him to complete campaigning in the Kalyan and Dombivali area by September 29, 2010. Based on the circular, the Deputy Commissioner of Police issued a notice to Thackeray and asked him not to stay within KDMC area beyond 10 pm, that year. The notice said he couldn’t visit any political party office, residence, hotel, lodges, guest houses and in case of violation, he may face prosecution under the section 126 of the Representation of Peoples Act. Despite this, it was alleged that Thackeray stayed in a house within KDMC beyond the notified time. The senior inspector visited him to serve the notice. But Thackeray refused to accept it and it was pasted outside the location.

In response to the FIR, charges under section 188 (disobedience to order by a public servant) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) were filed in 2011. Thackeray, summoned by the judicial magistrate in Kalyan, appeared before the court on February 5 of the same year and was granted bail.

According to reports, in 2014, Thackeray, represented by advocate Sayaji Nangre, approached the High Court seeking the quashing of the FIR. The HC, in April 2015, granted a stay on the proceedings and directed an expedited hearing. Nangre's primary argument centred around the non-cognizable nature of section 188 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), asserting that proceedings should be initiated through a complaint before the magistrate rather than an FIR.

The recent decision by the Bombay High Court marks the conclusion of the legal proceedings, providing relief to Raj Thackeray in this case.

Tags: Raj ThackerayRaj thackareyBombay High CourtPolitics NewsMaharashtra News
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiBeware! Mumbai Thak Thak Gang Targets Car on Kurla SLR Bridge, Theft Caught on CCTV

MumbaiMumbai Water Taxi: Two Vessels to Launch on September 22, Hydrogen Boats to Follow

PunePune Bus Accident: 12 Passengers Injured as Two MSRTC Buses Collide Head-On in Mulshi

MumbaiManoj Jarange-Patil’s Maratha Protest in Mumbai Hits BEST Bus Routes, Leaves Commuters Stranded

MaharashtraJalna Accident: 4 Killed as Speeding Car Plunges Into Well on Rajur-Tembhurni Road in Maharashtra

Maharashtra Realted Stories

ThaneThane: Five Boys Reported Missing in Bhiwandi in Single Day, Kidnapping Cases Registered

MumbaiMumbai: Online Gaming Addict Arrested for Rs 25 Lakh Extortion in Bishnoi Gang’s Name

MumbaiMumbai: Woman Dies by Suicide in Goregaon Over Husband's Alleged Extramarital Affair

MaharashtraGanpati Visarjan 2025: Bhayandar Villagers Resist Artificial Ponds, Demand Natural Ganesh Idol Immersion

MaharashtraRatnagiri Ganesh Visarjan Tragedy: One Drowns, Another Rescued After Being Swept Away in Jagbudi River