City
Epaper

Plea for limiting pages in court proceedings: SC says one-size-fits-all approach won't suffice

By IANS | Updated: August 11, 2023 20:35 IST

New Delhi, Aug 11 The Supreme Court on Friday disposed of a PIL seeking guidelines for setting a ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 11 The Supreme Court on Friday disposed of a PIL seeking guidelines for setting a page limit with regard to petitions or written submissions filed before judicial forums.

"How can we say in all matters that there should be a word limit or a page limit on written submissions? On the one hand, if there is a Constitution Bench hearing Article 370 petitions and then you have a Petition under the Consumer Protection Act, can we say that you should not have filed a written submission beyond 10 pages?" a bench, headed by CJI D.Y. Chandrachud, and comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, asked advocate Mohini Priya, appearing for the petitioner.

In response, the advocate suggested if the matter could be taken up on administrative side of the Supreme Court as it pertains to access to justice.

The CJI-led bench said that though the concern raised in the PIL is "laudable" but it is difficult to frame "one size fits all" direction of such nature.

However, itt directed that if the PIL litigant has any concrete suggestions, he will be at liberty to make a representation before the Secretary General of the Supreme Court. The plea referred to the practice in the Supreme Court of the US where rules provide word limits for the different kinds of petition briefs and replies.

At this, the bench said: "American Supreme Court jurisdiction is very different from ours. We are a court of appeal and a constitutional court."

CJI Chandrachud said: "We have introduced nodal counsel who are tasked with preparing digital copies of the entire compilation. Additionally, we have decided against accepting written submissions after the commencement of the hearing (in Article 370 matter). We are progressing, but a one-size-fits-all approach won't suffice."

The public interest litigation said that lack of any specific rules defining the page limit of petitions filed before the court results in delay in justice delivery. It sought restrictions on the practice of annexing voluminous documents or judgements as annexures to petitions filed before the courts.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: congresspitrodadelhimodideepikabjpwest-bengaldeepika-padukoneajay-devgnthakur
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalVeteran Congress Leader Rameshwar Dudi Passes Away After Being In Coma For 2 Years

Social Viral'Flight Le Leta': Netizens React as Mumbai-Delhi Tejas Rajdhani Express Ticket Costs Rs 5,500

EntertainmentRandeep Hooda and Lin Laishram Join Archery Premier League as Co-Owners of Delhi's Prithviraj Yodhas

EntertainmentRani Mukerji Breaks Silence on Work Hour Debate Amid Deepika Padukone’s Kalki 2898 AD and Spirit Row

NationalDelhi: Food Delivery Worker Bullied in Narela, Drunken Customer Misbehaves with Police

National Realted Stories

NationalBihar polls: EC reviews enforcement strategy to ensure free and fair elections, to address media today

NationalAgriculture backbone of India’s economy, and farmers are its soul: Shivraj Singh Chouhan

NationalNIA chargesheets 11 accused in Punjab police station attack case

NationalED attaches Rs 423 crore-worth properties of Ozone Urbana for failing to deliver flats

NationalAssam Rifles provides skill training to 56 youths in Manipur