City
Epaper

Ayodhya case: Mosque was built by pulling down temple, counsel tells SC

By ANI | Updated: August 20, 2019 21:45 IST

The counsel, representing deity Ram Lalla Virajman, one of the parties in the Ayodhya title dispute case, on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the disputed structure (mosque) was put in place either on the ruins of the temple or by pulling it down.

Open in App

The counsel, representing deity Ram Lalla Virajman, one of the parties in the Ayodhya title dispute case, on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the disputed structure (mosque) was put in place either on the ruins of the temple or by pulling it down.

"Pillar bases found by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) have established the existence of a huge structure at the site of Babri Masjid. Other evidence revealed that it was a Hindu religious structure," C S Vaidyanathan informed a five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi.

The counsel relied on a document by the agency, which stated that a stone slab from the 12th century was recovered which had verses that spoke of King Govind Chandra, the king of a kingdom whose capital was Ayodhya.

"The verses found on the stone made it clear that there was a big Vishnu temple at that place and the ASI in the excavation had found the remains of that temple," he said.

The disputed site is considered to be Lord Ram's Janmabhoomi (birthplace) and it has been the faith and belief of Hindus that make them visit the Ram Janmabhoomi for darshan, the counsel added.

He also read out the verbatim of the Muslim witnesses collated by him. "The Muslim witness stated that if the mosque was built after the demolition of a temple, they will not consider it a mosque. He said that the mosque cannot be built on a forcibly occupied place," he added.

Vaidyanathan said that the Muslim side, including Sunni Wakf Board and others, had earlier said that there was no such pre-existing structure, but later changed their stand and said that the Islamic structure existed beneath Babri Masjid.

The constitution bench, also comprising Justice SA Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S A Abdul Naseer, is conducting a day-to-day hearing in the Ayodhya title dispute case after the mediation panel failed to achieve an amicable settlement.

The apex court is hearing appeals against September 30, 2010 verdict of the Allahabad High Court in the case.

The High Court in its verdict had ordered equal division of 2.77-acre disputed land in Ayodhya among the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.

The 16th-century Babri Masjid was demolished on December 6, 1992.

( With inputs from ANI )

Tags: ayodhyaRam LallaRam JanmabhoomiHigh Court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalDelhi Red Fort Car Blast: DNA Test Confirms Dr Umar Un Nabi Was Suicide Bomber Driving i20 Car; Planning to Attack Ayodhya

NationalAyodhya: Shree Ram Janmabhoomi Temple Construction Completed Ahead Of "Dhavj" Hoisting Ceremony

NationalMadhya Pradesh High Court Grants Divorce to Man, Says False Allegations and Humiliation by Wife Are Mental Cruelty

NationalPM Narendra Modi To Install Flag Atop Ram Temple in Ayodhya On November 25

NationalAyodhya Deepotsav 2025: From Ramayan Glory to AI Vigil - Devotion Meets Innovation in Uttar Pradesh’s Grand Celebration

राजनीति Realted Stories

MaharashtraBMC Elections 2025: Devendra Fadnavis Says Clarity on Seat-Sharing Will Emerge in Two Days

NationalBJP Candidate Satish Kumar Leading Over Tejashwi Yadav in Raghopur Assembly Constituency

NationalBihar Assembly Election Results 2025: Tejashwi Yadav Leads, Tej Pratap Trails in Early Trends

NationalTarn Taran Assembly By-Election 2025: 23.05% Voter Turnout Recorded Till 11 AM in Punjab By-Poll

MaharashtraWho Is Akshaya Naik? Shetkari Kamgar Paksha Named Mayoral Candidate of Alibag