City
Epaper

Surjewala moves SC against ordinances extending CBI, ED heads' tenure

By IANS | Updated: November 18, 2021 21:05 IST

New Delhi, Nov 18 Congress General Secretary Randeep Singh Surjewala has moved the Supreme Court against two ordinances ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Nov 18 Congress General Secretary Randeep Singh Surjewala has moved the Supreme Court against two ordinances that allow the Central government to extend the tenure of heads of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Enforcement Directorate (ED) for up to five years.

The plea questioned the reason for bringing the ordinance 15 days before the Parliament is to convene.

Surjewala, in the petition, contended that the extension of tenure, in this ad-hoc and episodic fashion, in fact reaffirms the control of the executive over investigative agencies and is directly antithetical to their independent functioning.

"Fixity of tenure has been repeatedly held to be an essential element in ensuring the independent functioning of government officials. A piecemeal extension system, as envisioned by the Impugned Ordinances and Notification, creates a perverse incentive for officials to serve at the pleasure of the Central government," said the plea, filed through advocate Abhishek Jebaraj.

The CBI and ED directors are appointed for a two-year tenure.

The plea argued that this extension is against the top court rulings, which intend to insulate these agencies from any kind of political interference.

On September 8, the top court, considering the extension granted by the Centre to the incumbent ED director, said such extension should be in "rare and exceptional" circumstances and for a short period.

Surjewala also cited the 1997 decision in Vineet Narain case wherein the top court held a minimum secured tenure for CBI and ED directors, and also cited the 2019 Alok K. Verma case where the need to insulate CBI director from all extraneous influences was laid down.

"These investigative agencies were created to serve the public but with these amendments, they are being subordinated in a clear and malicious fashion to serve the will of the executive," added the plea.

On November 14, two ordinances Central Vigilance Commission (Amendment) Ordinance and Delhi Special Police Establishment (Amendment) Ordinance which amended Section 25 and Section 4B of the CVC Act 2003 and DSPE Act 1946, respectively, were promulgated.

The amendments allow the Central government to extend their original tenure by one year at a time with a rider that "no such extension shall be granted after the completion of five years in total, including the period sanctioned in the initial appointment".

On Wednesday, Trinamool Congress MP Mohua Moitra also filed a petition challenging the two ordinances.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Abhishek jebarajcongressSupreme CourtRandeep Singh Surjewala
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraSupreme Court Clears Way for Local Body Elections in Maharashtra, Retains Pre-2022 OBC Quota

NationalOperation Sindoor: Congress Leader Jairam Ramesh Hails Strikes, Stands With Armed Forces

Maharashtra"Local Body Elections Long Overdue, We Are Fully Prepared", Sanjay Raut on SC Order

MaharashtraMaharashtra Local Body Polls 2025: Supreme Court Asks State Commission to Conduct Elections Within 4 Months

EntertainmentSamay Raina and Four Others Summoned by Supreme Court Over Mocking Disabled Individuals

Politics Realted Stories

MaharashtraPower Struggle in Maharashtra? Gulabrao Deokar, Satish Patil Join Ajit Pawar’s NCP Amid Mahayuti Rift

Maharashtra'Unity Not Just for Elections': MNS Leader Sandeep Deshpande on Possible Thackeray Alliance

PoliticsMurshidabad Violence: Shehzad Poonawalla Slams Yusuf Pathan Over Tea Post, Says, “As Hindus Get Slaughtered…”

PoliticsTamil Nadu Assembly Elections 2026: BJP-AIADMK Join Hands, Palaniswami To Lead Alliance, Says Amit Shah

Politics‘No Injustice to Muslims’: Shiv Sena Leader Manisha Kayande Slams Opponents of Waqf Amendment Bill