City
Epaper

Time-bound defection: Only parliament can frame laws, says SC

By IANS | Updated: July 1, 2021 12:10 IST

New Delhi, July 1 The Supreme Court on Thursday asked how it was possible for the top court ...

Open in App

New Delhi, July 1 The Supreme Court on Thursday asked how it was possible for the top court to frame legislation, when it is in Parliament's jurisdiction.

A bench headed by Chief Justice N.V. Ramana made this observation during a hearing of a plea seeking directions to the Centre to lay down strict time-frame for Speakers of Lok Sabha and state Assemblies and chairperson of Rajya Sabha to decide disqualification petitions filed against MPs/ MLA for defection to other parties.

The plea filed by member of the All India Congress Committee (AICC) Ranajit Mukherjee also urged the court for directions of guidelines for Speakers to have an uniform process of decision-making in cases of defections across India.

The counsel for the petitioner argued that the plea has been filed for guidelines and to decide defection cases in an urgent and time-bound manner.

The bench also compromising A.S. Bopanna and Hrishikesh Roy noted that the prayers sought by the petitioner fall within the domain of Parliament and the court cannot frame laws.

The bench said: "How can we frame legislation? There is a separate institution (Parliament) for that".

The bench pointed to the counsel that the same issue was raised in the case relating to disqualification of Karnataka MLAs, which was turned down by the court.

The Chief Justice said: "I have already expressed my opinion in the Karnataka MLAs case. This issue was raised in this case also and senior advocate Kapil Sibal had advanced same argument."

The bench added the issue was left for Parliament to decide, and asked the counsel to read the judgment in the matter and then come back to the court. The top court has scheduled the matter for further hearing after two weeks.

The plea said: "These rampant and unchecked political defections for personal or political gain, hit at the root of Indian democracy, and violate the fundamental rights of Indian Citizens, under Article 21 of the Constitution".

The petitioner had urged the court to examine mala-fide delays on the part of the Speakers of legislative assemblies while deciding issues related to political defections.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Ranajit mukherjeeparliamentNew DelhiThe Supreme CourtHrishikesh RoySabhaThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-westNew-delhi
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalDelhi Bomb Threat: Nine Schools on High Alert as Email Claims Explosions, Parliament Mentioned

NationalPM Modi Skips Lok Sabha Amid Ex-Army Chief’s Unpublished Memoir Row; BJP, Opposition Lock Horns

National'Have a sweet': Rahul Gandhi Offers Toffee to Priyanka Gandhi Vadra As She Speaks About Parliament Showdown (Watch Video)

NationalWhich Book Was Rahul Gandhi Referring to in Parliament, and What Does the Book Say?

NationalWinter Session 2025: Parliament Adjourns Sine Die - Know 8 Key Bills Passed During The 19 Sessions

Politics Realted Stories

PoliticsTelangana CM Revanth Reddy performs Bhoomi Pooja for Basara temple expansion

Politics"Mamata Banerjee just wants votes and nothing else": BJP candidate Rekha Patra

PoliticsHimanta Biswa Sarma, his wife continue to counter Congress over its allegations; FIR lodged with Assam Police

Politics"Serious developmental and employment challenges": BJP's Anil K Antony slams CM Pinarayi Vijayan

Politics"Will take strongest action against Pawan Khera": Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma