City
Epaper

Gujarat HC denies interim relief to Kejriwal, Sanjay Singh in defamation case

By IANS | Updated: August 11, 2023 15:15 IST

Ahmedabad, Aug 11 The Gujarat High Court on Friday declined to grant any interim relief to Delhi Chief ...

Open in App

Ahmedabad, Aug 11 The Gujarat High Court on Friday declined to grant any interim relief to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and Aam Aadmi Party's (AAP) Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh.

Both the politicians had sought an interim stay on proceedings in a criminal defamation complaint filed by Gujarat University until the disposal of their revision plea challenging the summons issued to them.

Justice Samir J. Dave passed the order after hearing arguments from Senior Advocate Mihir Joshi, counsel for Arvind Kejriwal, and Public Prosecutor Mitesh Amin.

The defamation case emanates from derogatory statements allegedly made by Kejriwal and Singh concerning Prime Minister Narendra Modi's academic degree.

A metropolitan court in Ahmedabad had summoned both the politicians on August 11 in the case.

On August 5, the City Civil & Sessions Court Ahmedabad had rejected their plea to stay the proceedings in the trial pending the disposal of their revision plea.

In response, both AAP leaders approached the Gujarat High Court, praying for an expeditious hearing of their revision plea.

During the arguments, senior advocate Joshi maintained that personal appearances are typically dispensed with in summons cases, especially when a Constitutional Functionary is involved. He also argued that the delay was attributable to the complainant (Gujarat University) and not to Kejriwal.

Joshi expressed his opinion that since the order of the Magistrate's court issuing summons had been challenged, the Sessions Court should have stayed the defamation case proceedings until the revision plea's disposal.

However, the bench noted that Kejriwal himself had given an undertaking to appear, and therefore, he should not avoid appearing before the Court. Senior advocate Joshi responded that this undertaking doesn’t deprive Kejriwal of filing a revision plea, and in these circumstances, the proceedings should have been stayed by the sessions court.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: congresspitrodadelhimodideepikabjpwest-bengaldeepika-padukoneajay-devgnthakur
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalDelhi Shocker: 24-year-old Man Stabbed To Death, Following Drunken Quarrel Over Money, Accused Arrested

NationalBJP Parliamentary Board To Meet on Aug 17, Discussion Likely on Vice Presidential Candidate

NationalDelhi Tragedy: 5 Dead, 11 Rescued After Roof collapse at Dargah Sharif Patte Shah near Humayun's Tomb

NationalGhaziabad Horror: Two Bikers Dies In Head-on Collusion While Performing Dangerous Stunt on Delhi-Dehradun Expressway , Disturbing Video Emerges

ThaneThane: Congress, Other Groups Protest KDMC’s Meat Sale Ban on Independence Day (VIDEO)

Politics Realted Stories

Maharashtra'Chaddi Baniyan' Protest at Maharashtra Assembly: Opposition Stages Agitation Against Sena MLA for Punching and Slapping Canteen Staff (Watch Video)

MaharashtraMaharashtra Monsoon Session: Ajit Pawar Slams Bhaskar Jadhav Over Fund Allegations, Says 'No Need for Unsolicited Advice'

MumbaiUddhav Thackeray Pats Raj Thackeray on Back at Victory Rally Speech; Emotional Video of Thackeray Brothers Goes Viral

MaharashtraMarathi Language Controversy: ‘Did I Pass a GR Against Brotherhood?’ Devendra Fadnavis Hits Back at Uddhav & Raj Thackeray

NationalAssembly Bypoll Results 2025: AAP Wins Visavadar and Ludhiana West Seats; Congress Wrests Nilambur Seat in Kerala