First partner of california, Land-grant university in Berkeley, California

Los Angeles, Feb 24 Disgraced producer Harvey Weinstein has been sentenced to 16 years, effectively ensuring the former Hollywood mogul and convicted rapist will spend the rest of his life behind bars.Weinstein's sentencing was held in downtown Los Angeles on Thursday morning, nearly two months after his Los Angeles trial concluded with a jury convicting him on three counts of rape and sexual assault, reports Variety.Weinstein is already serving a 23-year sentence in New York, after being convicted of rape and sexual assault in that jurisdiction in his 2020 criminal trial.On Thursday, the judge ordered Weinstein to serve his L.A. sentence consecutively after New York.Before he was sentenced, Weinstein addressed the court, making one final plea to Judge Lisa B. Lench."I maintain that I'm innocent," Weinstein said."This is about money and coming after me," Weinstein said. "Please don't sentence me to life in prison. I don't deserve it. There are so many things wrong with this case. There is no evidence. This is a setup. I beg your mercy."Weinstein's defence, led by Mark Werksman and Alan Jackson, asked the judge to sentence him to three years per charge, urging her to look to the man he was "before he became accused as a sexual predator," and saying that he has "become a caricature because of the #MeToo movement."His attorney noted that Weinstein has medical issues and is a father."He's a 70-year-old man in bad health," Werksman said."He lived a full, rich and productive life that included being a father to five children. He has become to his children the disembodied voice on the telephone."Werksman hailed Weinstein's work in the entertainment industry, urging the judge to recognise his accomplishments.After Weinstein and his attorneys spoke, the judge sentenced Weinstein to 16 years for the three charges on which the jury found him guilty."These are not easy decisions to make, but this is my decision," Lench said.All three charges on which Weinstein were convicted were based on the counts relating to Jane Doe #1, a European model who testified she was raped by Weinstein at Mr C Hotel after the L.A. Italia Film Festival in 2013.Joe Doe #1 appeared in court, alongside her daughter, to deliver an emotional victim impact statement, crying throughout as she spoke at a podium."It is extremely difficult for me to stand here, ten years later, as the effects of this rape are still raw, and difficult to discuss. I have been carrying this weight, this trauma, this irrational belief that it was my fault for years," she said, addressing the judge."His selfish, disgusting actions have greatly impacted me and my life. What he did to me was horrible."When Weinstein spoke, Jane Doe #1 was audibly crying, and her tears were heard over his statement. Weinstein told the judge that Jane Doe #1 lied about the entire rape and maintained that he never sexually assaulted her, or even came in contact with her.Weinstein's team has focused intently on Jane Doe #1, using her as their argument to request a new trial with a new jury, which the judge shot down on Thursday morning, ahead of the sentencing. Jane Doe #1 will likely be the focal point of their appeal.Weinstein's attorneys have argued that the court wrongly precluded them from introducing relevant evidence and argument, particularly centring around Jane Doe #1. Before the sentencing, Jackson delivered a lengthy argument as to why Weinstein should be granted a new trial, alleging that the judge "allowed perjury on the stand" from Jane Doe #1.He said the defense was "sandbagged by a lie told on the stand," and claimed the jury "got sucked into the lies of Jane Doe #1."Two jurors were seated in the gallery on Thursday, which Weinstein referenced to the judge as support for him. Weinstein's attorneys said the jury "would never have voted to convict if they knew the truth." Lead prosecutor, deputy D.A. Paul Thompson, replied back at Weinstein's attorneys, exclaiming: "It is certainly not the defence's job to go hunt down jurors."Before denying Weinstein's motion for a new trial, the judge said that speculating on whether jurors might have changed their verdict, based on evidence that wasn't submitted into the case was "speculative" and not "appropriate."Shortly after court was dismissed on Thursday afternoon, the two jurors present spoke to reporters in the hallway. They said they had been in communication with the defence, and were interested in coming to Weinstein's sentencing to gather more information."I was never here to advocate," a juror named Michael told Variety. "There is so much we don't know in this case. The more info, the better because it helps flesh it out." A juror named Jay said: "We weren't on anybody's side," and expressed that even with more evidence, he's unsure whether he would have changed his conviction."I don't know if he would have been acquitted. I don't even know if it's true that she lied," Jay said. "I don't feel bad," he said of Weinstein. "We knew he was going to get sentenced."Thursday's sentencing all but ensures that Weinstein, who will turn 71 next month, will spend the remainder of his life in prison, marking a stunning downfall for the the Oscar winner who reigned over Hollywood and was once one of the most powerful individuals in the entertainment industry.His team, however, is still fighting for Weinstein's freedom. Werksman and Jackson said on Thursday that they will be appealing the Los Angeles conviction. In New York, the Court of Appeals, which is the highest court in the state, agreed to hear Weinstein's appeal of his 2020 sex crimes conviction.In his L.A. trial, which ran from October through December 2022, prosecutors argued that Weinstein was a predator who used his power to lure and attack women in hotel rooms under the guise of a business meeting or audition, while his defence argued that the women willingly engaged in "transactional sex" because Weinstein was so influential in the entertainment industry.Weinstein initially faced 11 charges in L.A., but four charges, all relating to Jane Doe #5, were dismissed in the midst of the trial. The jury delivered a split verdict, convicting him on the three counts relating to Jane Doe #1 but acquitting him of the sexual battery of a massage therapist, identified as Jane Doe #3. They could not reach a unanimous verdict on the charges involving two other accusers, aspiring actor and screenwriter Lauren Young, known as Jane Doe #2 in the case, and the First Partner of California, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, who was Jane Doe #4. The judge declared a mistrial on those three charges.Weinstein has been accused by more than 100 women who have publicly come forward with allegations of sexual assault, abuse and harassment that have spanned decades. His fall was the fuse the ignited #MeToo in 2017, and the story the survivors coming forward even inspired a major studio film," she said.Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

First Partner Of CaliforniaFOLLOW

First partner of california, Latest News

2023 perennial winner Joey Chestnut is out of the 2024 Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest due to a deal ... ...

California, March 17: Indian athlete Gulveer Singh broke the long-time national record in the men's 10,000 metre category during ... ...

Marco Troper, the 19-year-old son of former YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki, was discovered dead in his dormitory at the ... ...

An Indian-origin family hailing from Kerala tragically met their demise in their California home in what appears to be ... ...

Heavy rainfall triggered massive flooding in San Diego on Tuesday (January 23), leading to major waterlogging in California and ... ...

A Hindu temple has been vandalized with anti-India and pro-Khalistan graffiti on its exterior walls in Newark, California, United ... ...

In the vibrant landscape of Palm Springs, California, where the sun kisses the desert and the city thrums with ... ...

Los Angeles, Feb 24 Disgraced producer Harvey Weinstein has been sentenced to 16 years, effectively ensuring the former ... ...